Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Business Ethics Journal Review


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 18:40, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Business Ethics Journal Review

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

New journal, too young to have become notable yet. No independent sources, not listed in any selective major database. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. As for the "journals covered", WP:NOTINHERITED obviously applies. Randykitty (talk) 21:28, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 6 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Concur with nom's findings and rationale. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 15:13, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete [per nom. Nothing to add nor take away. Fiddle   Faddle  20:40, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.