Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Business Journal's Forty Under 40


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to American City Business Journals. Favonian (talk) 22:00, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Business Journal's Forty Under 40

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Contested PROD, No indication that the "Business Journal's Forty Under 40" is a notable list or award, all ref's are either self-published or from associated publications. Fails WP:GNG Mtking (talk) 12:58, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete This doesn't seem very notable. It is not like Time magazine's Person of the Year honor. And Adoil Descended (talk) 22:17, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep A major magazine and so a major list; widely cited;. Not famous like Time's person of the year, but it doesn't have to be famous, just / n   DGG ( talk ) 14:06, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect: Actually, I am pretty sure these lists are local lists that the various American City Business Journals pump out for each market they publish in.  E.g., the list currently in the article is the San Jose list for one year.  I would recommend we just redirect to American City Business Journals which already covers this feature.--Milowent • talkblp-r  17:49, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment: And please don't tell me this article was created to shore up Paul Dorian's notability? (As he appears on the random San Jose list)!--Milowent • talkblp-r  17:53, 31 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:11, 6 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Redirect per Milowent. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:48, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Business Journal. The list, although long would belong better in the magazine's page. SwisterTwister (talk) 03:26, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.