Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Business Process Model

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. Rossami (talk) 22:55, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Business Process Model
No potential to become enclyopedic the person who created this page also created ARIS House and The ARIS house of Business Engineering (HOBE) so it looks like advitisingGeni 11:53, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Probable advertising. Original research, because no sources or references are given. This does not appear to be a description of any established, recognized way of modelling business processes. (Will change my vote if convincing evidence to the contrary is presented). Dpbsmith (talk) 23:50, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete: I am not sure, here. It's not recreation of an exactly same-titled article, but I believe this is a recreation in content anyway.  My recollection is that a similarly nebulously-titled article existed with almost identical content.  The author was not a native English speaker and was translating, essentially, a piece of the business textbook he was given at his job.  In any case, the article here is impenetrable, original research. Geogre 03:12, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
 * I used to do business process modeling for a living. Still do on occasion.  This article has very little to do with the general concept (which would be encyclopedic).  This is a poor attempt to describe one company's proprietary approach to BPM consulting.  Rossami (talk) 22:55, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.