Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Business dna


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. OR; advertisment; NN seicer  &#x007C;  talk  &#x007C;  contribs  15:25, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Business dna

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No notability, appears to just advertise. Oscarthecat (talk) 11:02, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete An idea by a single individual which has not received any sort of attention in reliable sources. Both the sources in the article are self-promotional. - Mgm|(talk) 12:28, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:44, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Original research + self promotional + no reliable third party souces. Zero Kitsune (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete (G11) — You-know-what. MuZemike  ( talk ) 17:48, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as lacking notability and promotional. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:03, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Perhaps speedy as suggested by MuZemike. Clear case of WP:VSCT. The person who created the article is connected with the company/project. LeaveSleaves talk 03:58, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. G11!  JBsupreme (talk) 06:36, 25 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.