Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Business research


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 15:28, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Business research
Business research is a generic and useless term. It's "four" components already have their own articles. This "Business research" label adds no new information. At best, it's a trivial category, but it doesn't rate an article. Rklawton 18:57, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Business research was created by, who in turn created FreshMinds. The problem is that it is self advertisment, as Charlie Osmond is one of the founders according to this. Should we nominate FreshMinds to deletion as well? -- ReyBrujo 20:05, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: I am not against the company, mind you. I just don't like when the founder of the company creates an article about both his company, its tasks and the co-founder. -- ReyBrujo 20:07, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I'll let you do the honors of nominating FreshMinds - it's your find. I'll second it.  Rklawton 20:14, 5 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete as unencyclopedic, part of a walled garden. Stifle (talk) 01:13, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. The definitions are so common-sensical that this page isn't even needed.  Its only purpose seems to be to promote those rather non-notable companies listed on the bottom.  I also agree that FreshMinds does not belong on Wikipedia, and also Caroline Plumb is arguably non-notable/vanity, as well as Factiva. Fabricationary 03:33, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete No value in this text, and didn't even create the internal links to the valuable articles on the various subjects. GRBerry 02:44, 8 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.