Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Business writing

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. Rossami (talk) 06:27, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Business writing
Somones how-to guids for writing business correspondence, not-encyclopedic or particularly informative, delete--nixie 06:20, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. The very definition of original research. DaveTheRed 17:43, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * There's a Business English book at Wikibooks for this sort of stuff. I notice that this was created at the same time that Technical Writing was created (when technical writing already existed, of course), and is pretty much word-for-word identical to it.  This is a pointless fork. Delete.  Uncle G 18:44, 2005 Mar 22 (UTC)
 * Delete Pavel Vozenilek 17:57, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.