Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Busybody


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 04:57, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Busybody

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Appears to be a load of bloated original research in an attempt to expand on a dicdef. h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 17:25, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I'm not sure that anything can be written about this subject that can't be better treated at articles like gossip, and everything in the current article seems to be original research and/or trivia. EALacey 19:57, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Subdolous 20:13, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete per nom. AndalusianNaugahyde 16:55, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. The term could be notable if properly sourced and if somebody came up with a cogent article about the phenomenon (not the word).  But this article isn't.  There's nothing salvageable here (it can't even be stubbified), and no compelling reason why we need to cover this.Wikidemo 22:20, 5 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.