Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/But for Bunter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 17:41, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

But for Bunter

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Article is almost entirely plot and "quotes" (WP:TRIVIA?). Lacking any information about the book's notability and/or impact and/or critical reception, this is a delete. Strange Passerby (talk • contribs) 15:36, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 17:08, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete -- with no prejudice against recreation if someone wants to take on the article and rewrite it, as the subject does seem to very weakly pass the coverage portion of WP:BOOK on first glance. --rahaeli (talk) 22:10, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - based on the above find searches, there doesn't appear to be significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject, consequently this subject doesn't seem to be sufficiently notable for a stand alone article. PhilKnight (talk) 02:54, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.