Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Butera


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:44, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Butera

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable chain of supermarkets, also WP:NOTADIRECTORY  Jay Jay What did I do? 02:03, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
 * this search suggest that there may be enough content for an article, but it is mostly behind paywalls.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:55, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:20, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:20, 19 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:05, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:12, 27 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment - The article is promotionally written and the list of locations should be deleted straight away, but it seems to me that a chain supermarket that has been in business for 45 years may be sufficiently notable. I have found a couple of sources to support this, for example this and this. - MrX 01:18, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2013 March 7.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  06:25, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:ORG does not appear to be satisfied. Just having 9 grocery stores does not convey inherent notability. To keep the article, what is needed is for someone to point ou,t at a minimum, multiple reliable and independent sources with significant coverage. The Newsbank cite is full of "lady arrested for stealing catfood," "store owner dies" and tons of other trivial local news coverage. Quoting WP:ORG: "Evidence of attention by international or national, or at least regional, media is a strong indication of notability. On the other hand, attention solely from local media, or media of limited interest and circulation, is not an indication of notability; at least one regional, national, or international source is necessary." Edison (talk) 18:55, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per arguments by TonyTheTiger and Edison. There is some news coverage, but it's largely trivial, thus failing WP:ORGDEPTH. - MrX 19:16, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.