Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Butt dial


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete per WP:SNOW. Tim Vickers (talk) 22:54, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Butt dial

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

A new word --Unpopular Opinion (talk) 04:54, 2 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - Non-notable neologism.  Matt  (  Talk  )   05:20, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete - Spam. sixty nine   • spill it •  05:36, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Spam? Maybe from eating too much spam. -- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 05:42, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Hey what just happened? I must have typed Delete with my butt! -- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 05:38, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
 * At second thought, although it's funny, the term might be notable.-- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 05:41, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The term is included in Urban dictionary and there are some Youtube videos about it, but neologism anyway. --Unpopular Opinion (talk) 05:51, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
 * There's no sense in having articles for all of the individual terms (that aren't just protologisms) for acidentally dialling someone on a mobile telephone. There several ways in which this accident can happen, and it is a single concept.  The proper place for the subject is in some central article, not in multiple little 1-sentence articles all of the form "X is the act of accidentally dialling a number on a mobile telephone using Y.". Uncle G (talk) 14:38, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. WP:NOTDICDEF, WP:NEO, and it doesn't attempt to establish notability. Theymos (talk) 06:37, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Strongest delete absolute stupidity. JuJube (talk) 09:11, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Butt delete — This is not UrbanDictionary. Easily a nonnotable neologism. MuZemike  ( talk ) 12:47, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: even if notability can be proved, the article is so horridly written that I would vote delete on those grounds.  bahamut0013  words deeds   17:05, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above. -- .: Alex  :.  21:53, 2 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.