Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Butterfly Kisses (group)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 00:39, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Butterfly Kisses (group)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article is poorly sourced, borders on attacking, and the organization doesn't seem notable. a) The sources given are WorldNetDaily, a personal site, and a similar organization that isn't the subject of the article. b) The POV issues are rampant - which isn't a reason to delete, but it would be difficult to rewrite this (IMO) without deleting and starting over. c) I'm unable to find sources that corroborate any evidence, or even anything about the group in general. SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 17:13, 3 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, doesn't say why it is notable, per se, and isn't well-sourced, POV, etc. --  American Eagle ( talk ) 17:26, 3 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - attack page/non-notable pedophiles' org. forestPIG(grunt) 19:23, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 04:12, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 04:12, 4 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.