Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Butterfly Potion


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Wifione  Message 11:27, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Butterfly Potion

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This article was deprodded with an edit summary that suggested that sources for this article could be found in a Google Books search. Such a search reveals five hits, the first of which is not a reliable source and the second and last of which only list this EP along with other albums, not providing any information about the EP. Only the SPIN and Option sources are valid, and both only mention this EP in passing; neither constitutes significant coverage of the EP. A search for reliable, secondary sources reveals an insufficient amount of significant coverage. This article fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines for albums. Neelix (talk) 17:42, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 18:03, 2 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 01:28, 12 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Foetus (band). There just aren't enough sources to show that this album is particularly notable outside of the band. I did the book search as well, but didn't find anything except for very brief mentions.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 05:31, 12 January 2012 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * Delete Two of the four books returned by Google refer incidentally to covers of the song by other artists and not this EP, one is an incidental mention of the song and not this EP by professional entomologists who are excited by all that is butterfly, and one likely duplicates the article we're discussing (see Books LLC). Fails WP:GNG, WP:NALBUMS. Yappy2bhere (talk) 20:15, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.