Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BuyTigers.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:50, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

BuyTigers.com

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not exactly the most notable thing in the world. Especially suspicious that the article is up there now and the site was created by a twenty three year old SEO "expert".... Egg  Centri  c  01:51, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep: Unfortunately, whilst you might be right in this being part of a larger ruse to achieve notoriety by the chap in question, a quick look at the talk page for the article shows quite clearly enough grounds to justify the notability of the page. --Cantivsto (talk) 02:05, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep multiple sources where this is the main/only topic, meets notability WP:NPOLTomKoenig (talk) 03:46, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. Yeah, it satisfies WP:NWEB.  The hoax was apparently well-reported. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:40, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
 * I partially rewrote the article to make it less promotional and better highlight its notability. I located a source that identified it as one of the best Internet hoaxes, added a news article or two, and removed a bit of trivia.  There really isn't all that much to say about this site, and I think it could probably be merged (to List of hoaxes, I suppose?) without issue, but there is enough coverage to actually keep it. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:33, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 14:27, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.