Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buzz!


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy keep and tag for improvement. Non-admin closure. Shalom Hello 16:35, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Buzz!

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Too small, Little information, No notability Woggy 07:35, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 10:06, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

I will remove the speedy deletion notice (For Now) but if it is not improved in 1 Month, I will nominate it for deletion again. I will remove the notice when you reply (Woggy 13:01, 20 July 2007 (UTC))
 * Speedy keep. As part of a successful series of games it is indeed notable. There is more information in the articles on the individual games themselves. The article could be expanded to give brief descriptions of all the games (with main article links for more detail) and the series as a whole. ~Matticus TC 10:29, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

I have changed my mind. This article is a small article and does not deserve to remain in an encyclopedia i feel it needs to be improved because it has been the same size for a month. (Woggy 13:13, 20 July 2007 (UTC))


 * Comment How can the article be so small, if it is not even a stub? SpecialAgentUncleTito


 * Comment. You seem to misunderstand the purpose of AfD here. An article should be nominated for deletion for its subject, not its content. Just being short is not valid grounds for deletion (unless it's so short that it gives the reader no context at all), and nominating for deletion should not be used solely to give other editors the impetus to improve an article "or else". Articles can be tagged for improvement using various templates like, for example. To make two smallish articles a bit more worthwhile, I have boldly merged Buzz! Junior's content (which you also nominated for AfD) into Buzz! and closed that AfD. The article looks a bit better now, with more detail and a fairly-used cover image for good measure. I stand by my comment that the article should be kept and the debate closed early, because as a popular video game series it is worthy of an overarching "series" article to tie everything together (cf. Castlevania series, Metroid series, etc. etc.), but in the interests of not acting totally unilaterally I will leave it up to someone else to decide how this debate should be closed. ~Matticus TC 14:32, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep per above. Nominator should familiarize him/herself with the deletion process. — Travis talk  14:55, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep Ditto. SpecialAgentUncleTito 16:07, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.