Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buzz Burbank

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. Fernando Rizo T/C 19:52, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

Buzz Burbank
Delete nn radio person. The article is more than faintly ridiculous and the website says "check back soon". -Splash 22:19, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, newscaster on a syndicated radio show, passes WP:BIO. Kappa 22:21, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
 * And you have verified, independently of the article that he is a newscaster, yes? Like with this site which says "The Don & Mike Show is a morning show in the afternoon!". Taking as Gospel the contents of a stupid article is not good research. -Splash 22:23, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Well, there is this. I think we can assume Kappa knows how to use Google. (This is not a vote.) android  79  22:29, August 11, 2005 (UTC)
 * Which uses the exact same wording as the article, funnily enough. I've debated with Kappa before about an insistence on simply believing the article, and didn't really make much headway. -Splash 22:32, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The "stupid article" is the Westwood One (NYSE: WON) profile of the talent for one of their syndicated shows. And here's more from WJFK. The "morning show in the afternoon" is a sort of a joke. And "Buzz Burbank" and "Don Geronimo" are probably not real names. That's radio humor for ya. Ben-w 22:33, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Can someone please tell me why this page is so bad. I didn't make anything up. He is real and the website is down because Don, of Don and Mike, recently had his wife pass in a tragic car accident...asshat! -Givemealoosey 17:43, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, article perhaps needs some cleaning up but refers to an actual radio personality. --128.229.114.117 21:30, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge with Don and Mike. Not notible enough for his own article. --Kevin McManus 21:48, August 19, 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.