Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buzz magazine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Majorly  (o rly?) 12:51, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Buzz magazine

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

disputed PROD for NN-magazine delete Cornell Rockey 16:48, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * There's also multiple city wide magazines in the Netherlands and depending on the size of the city, they could easily be considered notable. Add to that, that this mag has a well-known person attached, and I'm having trouble understanding the nomination. What is your reasoning for calling this particular mag non-notable? - Mgm|(talk) 09:58, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Its a local listing, not even a newspaper. One notable contributor does not make a publication notable.  Cornell Rockey 16:14, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,


 * Delete as non notable against WP:CORP unless reliable sources are provided by the end of the debate. Nuttah68 09:52, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable. Even web presence is poorly maintained. Does not fulfill WP:CORP. Vassyana 07:20, 8 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.