Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bwain


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. It would be nice if people would provide evidence when having these sorts of discussions, and if there were any more meat to the article itself I'd extend it. Top tip - when you write an article, provide references! brenneman {T}  {L}  05:53, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Bwain
del promo of nonnotable japanese energy drink. Described as "internet phenomenon", hardly a blip among other usages of the word "bwain". mikka (t) 23:23, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

NOTE FROM THE CREATOR OF THE ARTICLE: I disagree. I've seen it mentioned MANY times on a number of different Internet message boards. Just because you haven't seen it personally doesn't mean it wasn't an Internet phenomenon. It was probably just one that you didn't catch. There are many things on the "Internet Phenomenon" page that were also incredibly minor as well, yet still are on it.
 * Please read about original research. The fact you saw it on many boards and concluded that it is a "pheno" does not count in wikipedia. A published reputable source must report is as "internet phenomenon". There are zillions of things in message boards. Like, I see the word "fuck" in tons of boards. But fck it is hardly an intrernet phenomenon. 04:09, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

True, but this was actually a big thing amongst forums. I think you have enough server space to accomdate a coulpe k of information that actually deserves to be up there moreso than some others. The moderators have an awfully fickle opinion when it comes down to what deserves to be included and what doesn't.
 * Delete This is a no Bwainer -- Ruby  02:30, 17 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions.   -- Kusunose 07:56, 17 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.