Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/By Force of Arms


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Revolution at Sea saga. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:25, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

By Force of Arms

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

There is no indication of notability per WP:GNG or WP:BKCRIT, not can I find any evidence of such notability. If anyone can provide content and references demonstrating notability I would support keeping it (or recreating it in the future). West Eddy (talk) 01:49, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 02:23, 12 May 2012 (UTC)


 * merge into the article for the series--though the books is probably notable in its own right, there is no need to make a separate article for it. --as for notability of the series, see my comment at Articles for deletion/Revolution at Sea Saga DGG ( talk ) 00:38, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:12, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 23:16, 25 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect to author - per nom's rationale for deletion and taking into account this is a plausible search term. Per my comment here, I think that Revolution at Sea saga (AFD currently also open) should also go, so no redirect there. ŞůṜīΣĻ ¹98¹ Speak 23:30, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Revolution at Sea saga. There's been just enough coverage of the series via reviews and an article to show some notability, just just barely.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 06:14, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Revolution at Sea saga now that the series has been kept, unless more than one review can be found for this book. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:33, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.