Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Byron Good


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep; nomination withdrawn and abundance of support for keeping. Josh Milburn (talk) 08:48, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Byron Good

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No references supporting the text. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 13:01, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep: I've found several citations to confirm subject notability, most of which have been added to the article. Article has been reduced and restructured according to Biographies of Living Persons guidelines. I've tagged a few needed citations, perhaps these statements should be removed if they cannot be verified. Nickknack00 (talk) 21:15, 25 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Nsk92 (talk) 23:37, 25 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep. A tenured Harvard professor with over 8000 GS citations not notable? Nominator deserves a WP:Trout. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:38, 26 May 2016 (UTC).
 * Note that when I nominated it, it was an unreferenced newly written BLP.. Agree this should have been a WP:BLPPROD rather than a WP:AFD. Not that someone has referenced the article happy to see this closed. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 08:08, 26 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. The article was not in great shape and still needs work, but the subject is certainly academically notable. GS results are high, he was an editor-in-chief of a reasonably high-profile journal (Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry), gave a named lecture at Oxford in 2010, served as President of a scholarly society (although not a super big one) in 2013-2015, and edited a bunch of books. Overall, enough here to pass WP:PROF. Nsk92 (talk) 00:45, 26 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.