Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Byron Wilson Jr


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:28, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Byron Wilson Jr

 * – ( View AfD View log )

References and links consists only of very trivial mentions. No indication that he played a fully professional game per the notability guideline for American football players. VQuakr (talk) 07:39, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Delete I second this nomination for deletion. 50.46.251.171 (talk) 08:05, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 15:07, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 15:07, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Comment He played in the Arena Football League which satisfies WP:NSPORTS. However, per WP:NSPORTS, this only means it is likely that sufficient sources exist and "meeting of any of these criteria does not mean that an article must be kept." I'm not convinced that this player is not WP:Run-of-the-mill unless coverage that goes beyond WP:ROUTINE can be identified. —Bagumba (talk) 21:18, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the clarification! Are there enough reliable sources out there to keep this as a verifiable article? VQuakr (talk) 22:00, 24 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

 Delete WP:Run-of-the-mill person where coverage was not found to go beyond WP:ROUTINE. Although he played in the Arena Football League which satisfies WP:NSPORTS, WP:NSPORTS allows that "meeting of any of these criteria does not mean that an article must be kept" if consensus decides the player is not notable. —Bagumba (talk) 01:50, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.