Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Byte shop


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to History of Apple. Spartaz Humbug! 05:21, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Byte shop

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unremarkable company, save for its involvement in the History of Apple Computer, which is covered sufficiently in that article. PROD denied by author without comment. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:31, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The author did comment on the talk page! --Triwbe (talk) 18:08, 11 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  --  I 'mperator 15:39, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  —RadioFan (talk) 16:23, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Major claim to notability, sale of the Apple I, is well covered in History of Apple no other major claim to notability made here RadioFan (talk) 16:22, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The following was placed on the talk page but I assume it was meant to be included in the AFD discussion: WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:37, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't necessarily think this page should be deleted. The author has a point, Apple would probably not exist if it was not for them. Levarrishawk (talk) 15:53, 11 August 2009 (UTC) — Levarrishawk (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Which is why this information is covered in History of Apple.--RadioFan (talk) 20:20, 11 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Redirect - to Paul Terrell, of which it is basically a copy. --Triwbe (talk) 18:06, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect - to History of Apple, from which this article looks to be copy/pasted. This is tied to the company's notability as stated above. --Tckma (talk) 18:58, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.