Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bytecoin (cryptocurrency)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro (talk) 05:18, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Bytecoin (cryptocurrency)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Questionably notable cryptocurrency; the article has a single source. I tried looking for more sources and could only find coverage on cryptocurrency websites with doubtful reliability. BenKuykendall (talk) 19:42, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:08, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:08, 13 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete - Not Notable crypto in violation of general sanctions on cryptos and blockchain. Could be G11'd as promotion for the crypto in question. Bkissin (talk) 21:00, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and above - David Gerard (talk) 11:43, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Promotional in nature. Raymond3023 (talk) 18:22, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Balkywrest (talk) 23:37, 14 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Every day is another bytecoin. Smallbones( smalltalk ) 00:13, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - I think this article has seen better days and can be tidied up to the point of repair. I've come across a few sources relating its history and can begin to set it up properly.   Update: I've added these sources to the article. Do reconsider the position. Dr-Bracket (talk) 04:34, 18 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Those are not very reliable sources. The CoinTelegraph source is a press release; it was written by the folks promoting Gateio and as such is not an impartial source. CCN is crytocurrency news cites, the reliability of which is doubtful at best, per this RfC. In fact, a CCN source was already removed from the article in this edit. The Yahoo Finance source is simply a CCN article that is featured on Yahoo. BenKuykendall (talk) 04:45, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
 * You were told explicitly that cryptocurrency enthusiast websites are not reliable sources. This is your last reminder to read how to identify a reliable source - if you add any further unreliably sourced content you will be topic banned. MER-C 11:53, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
 * oh you know what, I've spent my whole time thinking CCN was CNN. I'd seen people debating about CoinTelegraph so I figured I'd throw it in there because alongside CNN that's not bad, but I see the problem. Thanks Dr-Bracket (talk) 14:53, 18 November 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.