Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Byxnet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 02:55, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Byxnet

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Article does not establish notability of the network. Citations are to primary sources directly connected with the network, or to third party IRC information site that do not establish notability. As far as IRC networks go, Byxnet is tiny. While this alone is not reason for deletion, it is evidence of lack of importance. Vertigo Acid (talk) 20:44, 7 February 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  00:52, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. I can't find much if any coverage about this IRC network. It might be popular in some circles, but that's going to be hard to document properly. Pcap ping  10:02, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this IRC network. Joe Chill (talk) 00:56, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as per WP:N. noisy   jinx  huh? 02:00, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.