Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C&H Distributors


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Rossami (talk) 19:06, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

C&amp;H Distributors

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

There is no indication of why this business in notable. There are no secondary sources. Awotter (talk) 20:09, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as non notable business. -- Redfarmer (talk) 20:16, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as not notable, can't see a speedy delete since they are claiming notability, but having govt contracts and 300 employees doesn't make you special or notable by itself. Pharmboy (talk) 00:05, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep as I believe it is notable; it got placed in at number 35 in the top 100 industrial distributors in North America, to say the least. --Nzgabriel (talk) 21:00, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom et al. Minimal sources, all but one unreliable.  35 is not ranked very high. Bearian (talk) 17:12, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: WikiProject Companies has been informed of this ongoing discussion. --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 04:03, 8 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.