Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cássio Ferreira


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 22:14, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Cássio Ferreira

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This player fails WP:GNG (due to lack of significant coverage) and WP:NFOOTBALL (as he hasn't yet played in a fully-proessional league - simply being contracted to a club is not enough). Please note the BLPPROD issue was raised at WT:AN by the article creator. GiantSnowman 12:24, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 12:25, 22 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails notability criteria (✉→BWilkins←✎) 12:28, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - He has not received significant coverage or played in a fully pro league, meaning the article fails WP:GNG and WP:NSPORT. Sir Sputnik (talk) 12:42, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - He will receive significant coverage as played in a fully pro league, because he was brought to club to play games, not only to fill roster. Official game of Croatian 1 HNL will be held 16.02.2013 so i propose that you leave article for few weeks. I ask you to find some kind of loophole to keep article or assistence in improvement. It is easy to delete work. User:Toni Tomas (talk) 14:49, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
 * It is also easy to restore work - should the article be deleted, we can un-delete it in mere seconds once he makes his professional debut. However, until he actually does that, he is not notable. GiantSnowman 14:01, 22 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Userfy until 16 February 2013 per a common outcome of such tricky issues, making sure to tag with . Bearian (talk) 00:26, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 02:32, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 02:32, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 02:32, 24 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete We have no way of knowing if he plays in the game until he plays in it. It's that simple.  DGG ( talk ) 06:23, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:GNG due to lack of coverage in reliable sources. Also fails WP:NFOOTY as he hasn't played in a fully pro league or represented his country at senior level. No prejudice against recreation once one of the criteria is met. Mentoz86 (talk) 20:17, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.