Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C.D. Girls Inter College (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 01:36, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

C.D. Girls Inter College
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Since the last AfD we are a lot stricter on school notability. Only primary sources provided, no coverage to meet WP:NSCHOOL. LibStar (talk) 00:20, 30 June 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:52, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools,  and India. Hey man im josh (talk) 00:28, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Uttar Pradesh-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:30, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * First AfD is here Articles_for_deletion/C.D.Girls_Inter_College. LibStar (talk) 00:55, 7 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete: There are no sources cited on the page, which in and of itself would yield a delete vote. When considering the prior AfD from 2016, that was before the 2017 RfC where WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES switched from assuming notability for post-secondary education to assuming not notability. If sources showing notability are found, I would be happy to change my vote.
 * Editchecker123 (talk) 02:58, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Relisting comment: Relisting to suggest Merge option. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 01:36, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge the small amount of referenced content to Rura, where there seems to be plenty of room. Agree that there is nothing here to support a full article; disagree that this content is so unencyclopedic that it should be cast out entirely. -- Visviva (talk) 00:28, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete - there is not really much to merge. I guess maybe the pictures? - Indefensible (talk) 15:50, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment: I hate to leave even a sentence of referenced encyclopedic information behind, but I would have no substantial objection to a redirect-without-merging. -- Visviva (talk) 04:05, 16 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.