Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C.I.D. (TV series)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:14, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

C.I.D. (TV series)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Article consist of Original research and fan comments and does not any reference.  Coercorash Talk Contr. 11:52, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:21, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:21, 5 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep - It is one of the longest running major TV shows in India. Gnews shows ample references (use CID+ sony as search string). Other issues can be handled by normal editing--Sodabottle (talk) 17:36, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Certainly notable in India. Remove original research and add cleanup templates instead of deleting. utcursch | talk 19:11, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Definitely notable. Issues with the article just need to be fixed, no need for the deletion of the article. warrior  4321   03:45, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Notable, I can see lots of references(google) and as Sodabottle said, it also one of the longest running TV series. I have started adding some quality references to article.  KuwarOnline  Talk''' 05:08, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Really?! I am surprised, why would someone jump into the deletion process, without bothering to do some simple searching at their end first, and save wiki time! As this is clearly notable! -12:37, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep; apparently one of the most popular Indian television series; includes references to being one of the longest-running Indian television programs in history, and apparently included in the Guinness Book of Records. There was a lot of promotional material in this article (which I've just culled), but the article just needs some clean-up, not deletion. Appears to be a lazy deletion nomination. Firsfron of Ronchester  19:40, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.