Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C.O.D. (album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Stifle (talk) 10:47, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

C.O.D. (album)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Album with no evidence of notability. Albacore (talk) 17:24, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep A notable album by a notable band. Plenty of sources here. Per #10 BEFORE "If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a good candidate for AfD".  Lugnuts  (talk) 17:41, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. I don't see anything in that Google search from reliable sources, just the usual fansites. The Allmusic review is fairly substantial, however, and is enough for me to err on the side of keeping.--Michig (talk) 18:14, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:48, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete -- notability not demonstrated in a reliable secondary source. N2e (talk) 03:26, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep: It is a notable album by a notable band with plenty of sources. -Ret.Prof (talk) 03:13, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep This article is notable because it's about an album released by Saint Vitus. Mr. Metal Head (talk) 01:23, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.