Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C.W. Jick Myers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 22:55, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

C.W. Jick Myers

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Survived PROD, so we're here. The source is the only non wiki mirror I can find, and the position it confirms provides no inherent notability. Star  Mississippi  15:40, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Star   Mississippi  15:40, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  Star   Mississippi  15:40, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions.  Star   Mississippi  15:40, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Comment for Star Mississippi, though.  I could only find a BLPPROD in this history.  WP:BLPPROD says that articles can be PRODded even if BLPPROD is declined.  I mean, we are here now so no big deal, but I don't think a PROD here would be controversial.  Jip Orlando (talk) 17:08, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for clarification. I had a prior PROD declined because there was a BLPPROD in the history and I wasn't 100% sure on policy. Star   Mississippi  17:33, 27 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Comment. He ran for the state legislature in 1958. After that, he is in the news quite a bit from 1969-1975 related mostly to state government positions where is is often quoted (this includes more that just energy czar) or mentioned. Not seeing much in-depth. Last mention is in 1975 where he announced he was quiting that position to seek a job in Washington. MB 18:49, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete He never held a postion at the level to make him pass our very broad notability guidelines for public officials, and the occasional quote in news coverage is not enough to make him notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:12, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. His role isn't an "inherently" notable one that would confer an automatic free pass over WP:NPOL, so it takes a lot more than just one brief quote from him in a news blurb about something else to get him over WP:GNG. Bearcat (talk) 18:04, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable. Gusfriend (talk) 06:48, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete No sign of notability is present in the article. Timetraveller80 (talk) 18:18, 3 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.