Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C. E. Powell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Authors of Plant Names. ✗ plicit  08:54, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

C. E. Powell

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Page author asserts notability to be derived from being a co-author of a plant name database. I show no hits on Google, Google Scholar, or JSTOR. Seems to fail WP:NACADEMIC. Even if there's an argument of GNG to be made, isn't being an author of a database, or, rather, a compiler, a bit of a stretch? Iseult  Δx parlez moi 07:01, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Women,  and United Kingdom.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:26, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. H-index of 1, no publications other than this co-authorship; does not meet general or special notability guidelines. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 10:34, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Authors_of_Plant_Names if we cannot find anything more about her (which I cannot). Elemimele (talk) 13:22, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes, that's a better idea. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 15:38, 2 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Authors of Plant Names as others have said, doesn't seem to be notable enough for a standalone article. -Kj cheetham (talk) 12:59, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Authors of Plant Names: fails WP:PROF as an individual. Gusfriend (talk) 04:46, 6 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.