Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C. Olivia Frost


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  05:52, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

C. Olivia Frost

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

I would use PROD, but I am on the fence. Does this BLP meet our standards for notability in academics? Tim 1357  talk  23:40, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  —David Eppstein (talk) 03:10, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. I am not seeing any claim of notability. Article just describes her career, which seems to be heavy on the administrative side of things. Abductive  (reasoning) 04:11, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Does not seem notable. Being a dean is not enough to pass WP:PROF, and I don't see much other reason for inclusion; having published a half a dozen articles in its own right is not enough. Drmies (talk) 04:16, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - not named professor, but her record barely ranks her as a notable professor at a major university Bearian (talk) 19:41, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, insufficiently notable, and the reasoning given for the prod decline ("full professors at Michigan are essentially always notable") doesn't jibe with wp:prof. Hairhorn (talk) 19:53, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.