Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C21 (company)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  21:44, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

C21 (company)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Firm does not appear to be notable despite some award typical of their industry. Philafrenzy (talk) 17:01, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Difficult to find any substantive news coverage other than the Manchester Evening News piece listed in the article. As they are a branding and advertising agency I'm sure they'd be the first to trumpet about any favourable news coverage or awards. Being 93rd in the Top 100 agencies outside of London doesn't shout notability at me! Sionk (talk) 20:53, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 22:42, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 22:43, 4 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Alpha_Quadrant    (talk)  05:55, 12 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete as per Sionk, fails WP:CORP. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 15:23, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.