Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C9 Entertainment


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 22:04, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

C9 Entertainment

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Possible WP:SOAP. Techyan （Talk） 05:19, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:09, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:09, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:10, 20 August 2017 (UTC)


 * comment - given that the article is a consists of a single statement "C9 is a record label and entertainment company" and then a list of artists, which are bare factual statements, how does SOAP apply? (note, I haven't looked into it, but this may be a walled-garden, non-notable label)    78.26   (spin me / revolutions) 14:00, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails GNG and WP:SPIP, reference fails WP:ORGIND. -- HighKing ++ 15:08, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete due to lack of independent coverage. The content is directory type content, and WP:YELLOWPAGES is relevant. Sjakkalle (Check!)  17:36, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails GNG. If I was nom, I would have used the WP:PROMO link instead of SOAP, because that subsection is non-applicable AFAICT . L3X1 (distænt write)  21:16, 28 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.