Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED RAIL CONTROVERSY


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was SPEEDY DELETED, A3. postdlf (talk) 02:38, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED RAIL CONTROVERSY

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This article runs afoul of WP:NOTFORUM, and is possibly a POVFORK of California High-Speed Rail as well. Feezo (Talk) 01:17, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:23, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:23, 14 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - Not appropriate and makes no sense. Dough 48 72  01:31, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.  Imzadi 1979  →   01:32, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete makes no sense, and the title is wrong. It also is very unencyclopedic. --P C B  01:32, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is absolutely clear.  User:Chief Officer Alex and/or their teacher may find a way forward by initiating a discussion at WT:TRANSPORT or one of the rail-related projects.  Haus Talk 01:33, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * DELETE PER NOM OR MOVE TO CREATOR'S USERSPACE. –FREDDDIE™ 01:35, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I give this a D...for delete. Need much be said here?Mitch32(Erie Railroad Information Hog) 01:37, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment CALIFORNIA HIGH&mdash;SPEED RAIL CONTROVERSY (with mdash in "HIGH&mdash;SPEED") created by the same author; that article moved by author to LLLLMMMM, marked for speedy deletion as no context and duly deleted. Tonywalton Talk 02:05, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and appears per to be a poor attempt to use WP as some sort of a school assignment. Tonywalton Talk 02:05, 14 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment Looking at the author's contributions is something odd going on here? Nothing for three years then something "getting a grade for this"? Might this be a compromised account? Tonywalton Talk 02:17, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.