Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CALinnovates


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:13, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

CALinnovates

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG/WP:CORPDEPTH. Sourced, but sources are passing mentions and quotes by the director. Was CSD-A7, but the template was removed by the main author. Still no credible claim of notability. Kleuske (talk) 17:03, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:08, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:08, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:08, 3 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Per nom. No claim of notability in the article. It has sources, but there is no in-depth coverage necessary to meet WP:GNG. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 17:14, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as there is no claim to notability. Also, the CSD tag should never have been removed as it states on CSD page "The creator of a page may not remove a speedy deletion tag". I was going to put a warning on their talk page for removing it, but saw that I was beaten to it. I have gone ahead and renominated as A7 due to the fact that it was improperly removed. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 04:36, 10 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.