Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CAOS


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete, article does not cite any sources (WP:OR, WP:V). Sandstein 20:42, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

CAOS

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Strong delete. Where do I start? This article is an unnotable mess.  En dl ess Dan  14:14, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
 * You start by reverting it to the non-vandalized version. GreenReaper 14:40, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Now it's just unnotable. -- En dl ess Dan  14:48, 3 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep. Taking a look at this Google Scholar search suggests to me that there is some interest in this scripting language from computer scientists and the like - it find 192 articles, but I admit that many of these are not related to the article. Interaction Modeling with Artificial Life Agents does seem to be relevant though. HTML version. I admit to not really understanding these sources, so what do you think folks? --TreeKittens 03:52, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions.   —TreeKittens 04:00, 4 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ➔ REDVEЯS has a new (red) iPod 19:51, 11 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.