Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CATWatch01


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Singu larity  09:11, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

CATWatch01

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails notability and verifiability standards. Sourcing is very sketchy: one mailing list post and one dead link. There's no evidence that this was ever discussed in anything approaching a mainstream source, or even a well-known niche source like 2600: The Hacker Quarterly or Cult of the Dead Cow. *** Crotalus *** 16:38, 13 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete, does not appear to be a program of any importance. Websearch brings up little; certainly no coverage from reliable sources. shoeofdeath (talk) 00:55, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:58, 19 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, same as the first time. -- Orange Mike  |  Talk  00:35, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. I, too, was unable to find any significant support for this article. Tim Ross ·talk  00:41, 23 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.