Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CAW Local 200


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep, only delete !vote changed to Keep Non-Admin Closure  D u s t i SPEAK!! 03:40, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

CAW Local 200

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails to cite sources. Fails WP:ORG. Delete GreenJoe 01:35, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unlike the other article (below in the list), this lists achievements.  Reads like a resume.  Still not notable, though - like the other one here in AfD, it's an individual local of a union.  The union is notable, the local is not. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 03:45, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Another one switched to keep. What a strange week. =^_^= Good job fixing it up.  -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 18:47, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is a big local and represents multiple bargaining units, not just one. Individual locals of (say) an airline mechanics union may not be notable if they all represent workers doing the same work, but individual locals of a diversified union such as the Canadian Auto Workers can be notable, especially if they are quite large, represent multiple bargaining units or a bargaining unit outside the traditional auto plant sector, or have a distinctive individual history. --Eastmain (talk) 17:35, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
 * PROVE IT!!!. GreenJoe 17:40, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions.   —Eastmain (talk) 17:35, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. A number of references have been added. This local is notable for its role in the Ford Strike of 1945‎. --Eastmain (talk) 19:57, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep major union locals are notable. what distinguishes "major" may not be clear, but this one is major enough, especially a shown by Eastmain's references. DGG (talk) 22:54, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - current references meet notability requirements. DigitalC (talk) 03:57, 17 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.