Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CA Plex


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 08:22, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

CA Plex

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable software. VG &#x260E; 01:40, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.   -- VG &#x260E; 01:41, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. Much of this article is gibberish. From the article, I have no idea what this software does: all bluelinks from TLAs are actually links to dab pages with no indication of which entry is the relevant one. I'm actually tempted to tag this one as a no context speedy. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 02:11, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Meh, the article obviously says this is an integrated development environment; no point in wiki-lawyering it away. VG &#x260E; 16:08, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay, that's been fixed. Still, Delete. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 21:34, 1 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Sorry that I do not find an obvious way to enter this conversation from the page so I am directly editing. But I found this page helpful in my research about the product and would prefer to just see it expanded instead of deleted.  I have just found an expert on CA Plex over at ADCAustin.com and will attempt to get them to contribute. - Symbology101  17:24, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I am the author, and very inexperienced at this. I am doing some research on what should be done to make this notable. Any advice is appreciated. I simply followed some examples of other articles that seemed equally brief (I would like to expand on this in the future certainly), but must be doing something wrong. Jdrhodes (talk) 15:47, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  TravellingCari  18:59, 5 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete: too much jargon. Alexius08 (talk) 04:34, 6 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.