Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CBIG Consulting


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 22:35, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

CBIG Consulting

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Lack of significant coverage by reliable third party sources. Legion Legion (talk) 20:33, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:57, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:57, 18 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Not notable and most sources are from PR releases. PenulisHantu (talk) 05:50, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Looks like a lot of sources but there are a lot of repeated sources and most of it is routine business news. Don't believe that shows notability.Sandals1 (talk) 17:43, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: A quick look at the sourcing looks like WP:CHURNALISM applies strongly with this one. The majority of the article is basically about rebranding and opening offices, and with the end "CBIG was mentioned by marketing web sites in 2014" summing it up nicely (see WP:TRIVIALMENTION). Waggie (talk) 07:41, 25 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.