Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CBS Kids


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was no consensus after consideration. Recommend renominate the articles separately instead. Mailer Diablo 14:26, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

CBS Kids
Delete WP:NOT a vehicle for advertising EricR 01:22, 11 March 2006 (UTC) Also adding the following pages:
 * List of MGM/UA Home Video Releases
 * Playhouse Disney Channel Afternoon Of Movies
 * Christmas Specials on CBC
 * Easter Specials on YTV
 * Christmas Specials on YTV

*Delete - They're all a bunch of pointless lists. --Spring Rubber 01:57, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
 * On second thought, keep CBS Kids, but delete all of the other sub-lists --Spring Rubber 02:13, 12 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete - All this information could be placed in a section of CBS if it's worth noting. -- light darkness (talk) 02:12, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
 * keep this information is worth noting. it is most definitely not advertising and is not an indiscriminate list.  it could be expanded significantly but there's nothing wrong with this page as a start off point. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 02:37, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. All of these articles can be factual and NPOV, and are on major television networks. For other articles of this type, see Category:Television programming blocks. - E WS23 | (Leave me a message!) 02:45, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, CBS Kids, this is the name CBS uses for their Saturday morning kids' tv block. Delete the rest.  User:Zoe|(talk) 03:05, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep CBS Kids and List of MGM/UA Home Video Releases as they are useful, and Delete the rest as they are some pointless lists of what TV shows the channel is going to show on a certain day and violates WP:NOT. --Jaranda wat's sup 03:15, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable AdamJacobMuller 03:26, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete NN, asinine. Moe Aboulkheir 04:34, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. These lists aren't exactly pointless, but ought to be renovated. Roy  boy cr ash  fan  [[Image:Flag_of_Texas.svg|30px]] 04:51, 11 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep CBS kids Merge the holiday specials lists into something, we don't need List of $HOLIDAY specials on $NETWORK. Abstain on the others. kotepho 04:55, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable TV programming block.   dbtfz talk 04:56, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, subtrivia. tregoweth 05:35, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete the lot of them. They don't even link to anything. Melchoir 06:06, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete at least the Playhouse Disney and the Holiday Specials lists. Totally pointless lists that read like advertisements. WarpstarRider 06:32, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as nn. If we have CBS Kids, why can't we have Playhouse Disney on an article on its own? --Ter e nce Ong 06:46, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep w/o prejudice as to separate renominations of the less significant lists. Monicasdude 14:32, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep CBS Kids, delete the rest -- getcrunk   juice  contribs 17:30, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. An existing thing. Article potentially expandable. mikka (t) 18:02, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Although the article as it stands now is simply a list, it could be expanded to cover the objective of such morning programming, how it complies with "e/i", target audience, and so forth. Last I checked, there is an article for every episode of The Simpsons. Why not this? -- Jay  (Reply)  18:06, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep CBS Kids is notable. Delete the rest. Compu  terjoe  19:43, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
 * deleteKsprayDad 21:46, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep CBS Kids for now, delete the rest.  young  american  (talk) 03:55, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as above. ProhibitOnions 21:53, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep seems notable enough. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  21:01, 16 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.