Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CCAPS


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 15:22, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

CCAPS

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (software) requirement. " It was deprodded by User:Bgwhite with the following rationale "There are alot of valid refs out there for this". Sadly, singe he couldn't be bothered to add them to this unrefereced articles, and I don't see anything other then a passing mention, we ended up here. If anyone can find any refs that helps this meet GNG, by showing the significance of this software (not just a passing mentions that it exists), please note this here, and explain why should we have this minor piece of code in our encyclopedia. It has benefited the company which created it, and whose representative added it here (WP:SPA, WP:COI: User:Volomike~enwiki) enough over the past 10 years. Such spam should be speedied, not end up here. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 13:50, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:50, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:50, 3 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete the one web link does not work, and searches do not turn up much of anything, so appears it never caught on. This is not an acronym encyclopedia anyway. W Nowicki (talk) 17:32, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete -- A7 material with no indications of notability or significance. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:44, 19 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.