Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CCleaner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Snow Keep. Even I use CCleaner ...., As noted above below it is a notable software and had I been aware of the AFD I too would've !voted Keep but pretty pointless now ... So closing as Keep instead. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 01:09, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

CCleaner

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The subject of this article does not meet the notability guidelines for products and services. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 22:18, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  22:30, 20 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. This is one of the most popular Windows utilities.  Coverage:  from Chip,  from TechRadar,  from PC Magazine,  from PC World,  from TechRepublic, etc.  I expect that pretty much every major technology site is going to have an article about this. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:57, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep as this is certainly enough. SwisterTwister   talk  06:47, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep well known free utility, lots of references in specialist computer publications. Shritwod (talk) 09:21, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable program. I need this article every day to check to see what the current version of the program is. Georgia guy (talk) 13:44, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
 * SNOW Keep. Well-known, plenty of coverage. Softlavender (talk) 08:58, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep very well known free utility, well referenced, even if you will never likely find it on Facebook, etc. Ironically, it would be known more widely if it was not free... Enquire (talk) 01:17, 26 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.