Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CEA-PME


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Daniel (talk) 21:56, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

CEA-PME

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP. BEFORE search turns up few mentions of the organization outside its own website and related business websites, and no reliable, third party sources. Geoff &#124; Who, me? 17:14, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Business,  and Belgium.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:07, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Obvious promotional tone of the article also asks for WP:G11, but I am not sure (how it stayed here for more than 15 years?). This nomination was created 6 days ago, so it should be resolved soon enough.  Delta  space 42 (talk • contribs) 17:25, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:NCORP and WP:PROMO. It is somewhat surprising how little coverage this organisation has, given the claims in the article. SailingInABathTub 🛁 23:57, 18 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.