Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CECS research supplement trial


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. not an encyclopedia article  DGG ( talk ) 03:52, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

CECS research supplement trial

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

1st-person account of original research, without a single source to its name Orange Mike  &#124;  Talk  00:13, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete More essay–like than any legitimate research. Major WP:COI and WP:OR.-- &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  00:17, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTESSAY, article has WP:COI issues. Also it fails WP:GNG. ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 00:45, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Entirely consists of Original Research. If this was published in a scientific journal, information from it could be added to the CECS article, but this is not the place to publish it, and even if it was published, it wouldn't rate a Wikipedia article in and of itself. It would be a source, not be something other sources write about. Fieari (talk) 02:03, 30 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.