Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CEOWORLD magazine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Clear A7 case. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:08, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

CEOWORLD magazine

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This "magazine" is a website, and fails Notability (web), specifically WP:WEBCRIT. I can only find passing mentions, and nothing independent and in-depth. References based on CEOWORLD have been added to various Wikipedia articles, but this appears to be largely ref-spamming. Edwardx (talk) 11:53, 4 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep: CEOWORLD magazine is mentioned in several published news articles and publications; for example, look through the results of this Google News search. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Salientunplugged (talk • contribs) 12:14, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:56, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:56, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:56, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:57, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:57, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:57, 4 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete This meets CSD#A7 (web) with absolute ease. The current article is no more than a directory listing and the "magazine" has zero credibility (based on opinion surveys and what not) and coverage (check Google and GNews just). --qedk (t 桜 c) 18:55, 4 June 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.