Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CER6 (disambiguation)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Withdrawn by nominator, with no editors currently !voting delete. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 02:24, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

CER6 (disambiguation)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Disambiguation page not required (WP:ONEOTHER). Primary topic redirect points to an article with a hatnote to the only other use. Pinging, ,. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:33, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Withdrawn by nominator now the page has a third valid entry. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:27, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:33, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. PROD shouldn't have been removed. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 23:29, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Dcirovic has just created Cer6 (retrotransposon). Does it appear notable to you? AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 06:40, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Overdue strike of my vote per the creation of Cer6 (retrotransposon). AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 22:19, 15 February 2024 (UTC)


 * del per rules. - Altenmann >talk 23:53, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Would you consider striking your vote now that Cer6 (retrotransposon) has been created? AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 22:21, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Withdrawn conforming now. - Altenmann >talk 23:11, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Relisting comment: Relisting as even though the nomination has been withdrawn, there are some editor arguing to Delete this article. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:16, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I have cleaned up this dab after the third entry's article created. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 08:33, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. I see that the nominator has withdrawn the nomination. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 01:53, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Now that all the votes other than keep have been stricken, the discussion is eligible for a speedy close. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 05:35, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

P.S. Just for fun of it, there is a condensing enzyme CER6 to write about, not to say that "condensing enzyme" is a poor redirect. "CER6 is believed to be the major condensing enzyme for stem wax and pollen coat lipid biosynthesis. " -- it looks like an article is warranted :-). - Altenmann >talk 23:29, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
 * P.P.S. google shows many other wonderful things names cer6, such as CER6=Cambridge English Readers advancing level 6, MGS Model CER6 Cable Reel Trailer, N-hexanoylsphingosine (Cer6) ,... in other words, there is a work for a True Wikipedianisatorist! - Altenmann >talk 23:29, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I can't believe the trailer doesn't have an article yet! Getting on it now. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 23:47, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Well, you are late; it has now :-), even with a picture :-) - Altenmann >talk 00:19, 16 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep, at least three topics by that name listed, at least two of which have verbose enough descriptions to (in my opinion) fail WP:TWOOTHER even if the primary topic was clear. And the conversation above suggests there may be more added soon. Though a quick search does show that the primary topic might in fact be the restransmitter and not the location? But I'll leave that to others. Rusalkii  (talk) 05:14, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Per the conversation above? I recommend rereading it, lol. As for the primary topic, I don't really care enough to invest in it right now, but perhaps. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 06:11, 17 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.