Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CFD-Wiki


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Angr/ talk 21:05, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

CFD-Wiki
Notability problems abakharev 17:50, 1 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep. User:Gimme a reason to keep this put it on Prod as Yet another wiki startup (YAWS) that fails Notability (websites) (no press coverage) so I am listing it on AfD. Yes, this wiki is small and might not have press coverage but it has quite a number of good written articles on CFD and numerical methods. I have already transferred to us four of them and intend to transfer a few more (the texts there are GFDL). I feel it is very impolite to use their texts and to not explain there they come from, so I think it is worth to keep this short article about their texts as it is used in the Template:CFDWiki. abakharev 18:03, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: It occurs to me that no good reason to override Wikipedia's guidelines (Notability (websites)} have been stated above.  Wouldn't it be better to remain consistent and follow the guidelines that have been agreed to by the community?  No vote.  James084 21:29, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

'This AfD is being relisted to generate a clearer consensus. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!' &mdash; Rebelguys2 talk 16:22, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. CFD-Wiki contains material from several scientific articles, reports and PhD thesises and thereby meets the Notability (websites) criteria. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.67.254.113 (talk • contribs)
 * Delete It's a wiki that any stranger can register and edit. How can scientific articles, reports and PhD theses exist in such a site?!  Transfering text from wikis or citing wikis as sources is akin to citing a CyberDude's post in some CyberWebForum.  Seriously, sir, WP:WEB criteria 3 cannot apply to publicly-editable wikis.  In this case, it fails #1 and #2, too. --Perfecto  00:33, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable website. — Adrian~enwiki (talk) 23:23, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per my comments in the first debate. James084 16:26, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Perfecto. PJM 17:23, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Adrian. Mallocks 20:26, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Perfecto. See also Stifle 00:55, 11 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.