Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CFOwise


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. I looked through the history, and found no edits to the substance of the article by identified users other than the original author, who has blanked the page. The bulk of edits by third parties were typographical or various challenges. I think this counts as user requested. FWIW, it was also advertising. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:39, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

CFOwise

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Submitted on behalf of User:Kkaufman, who may be the Ken Kaufman mentioned in the article and was the original article creator. He blanked the article attaching WP:CSD to it; however, since this article has been around for several months and has been edited by several people in the interim, I don't believe a G7 speedy deletion is appropriate. I personally don't believe the article meets notability requirements per WP:ORG, so I would favor its deletion. –Grondemar 04:11, 8 April 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 09:10, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.