Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CHIC (electronics)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 20:41, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

CHIC (electronics)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I could not find any other references other than the book and Wayback citations as the tool is discontinued. May not also establish notability and is one of Wikipedia's dusty articles. The Snowager -is awake  02:32, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. The Snowager  -is awake  02:34, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:33, 19 June 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95  &#40; Talk &#41;  18:52, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Insufficient information & referencing for an article.  DGG ( talk ) 20:01, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Unfortunately I have to agree as my searches (News, Books, browser, highbeam and thefreelibrary) found nothing good aside from page mirrors. SwisterTwister   talk  05:14, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. All of the relevant refs on the linked page are coauthored by Henzinger who was involved in the software development. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage.Dialectric (talk) 16:07, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete This page should be speedy deleted. I am a new editor learning the ropes and getting to know the Wikipedia trigger words. In my opinion this article is not meeting the criteria of importance ( no indication of importance). The web content displayed here has no indication of importance beyond professor Henzinger's research. It looks like a student in a good faith started this page. I think it is damaging to the professor's reputation and the education institution to have content like this on Wikipedia. I don't see how this article could be improved. This software tool could be mentioned or listed in List of model checking tools but in see also section. CHIR website is last updated in 2004 so this an old project. Gpeja (talk) 17:23, 3 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.